In the organization, both traditional team structure and self-managed team structures are prevailing. Between these two structures, there are some points of difference. These differences between traditional structure and self-managed team structure are shown in the following table:
Difference between traditional structure and self-managed team structure
In traditional team structure members act as teachers,
Dimensions | Traditional Structure | Self-managed Structure |
---|---|---|
|
Teams under traditional structure play authoritative roles. |
Teams under self-managed structures play the role of coach and counselor. |
|
Under traditional structure teams become an expert in their areas. |
Under this structure teams become champions and cheerleaders. |
|
Under the traditional teams, structure members act as teachers. |
While under this structure members act as resource allocators |
|
On the other hand, self-managed team members teachers, dairy managers. | |
|
In this system team members coordinate between the activities. |
Whereas under this system team members facilitate quitting. |
Both traditional team structures and self-managed team structures are suitable for organizations. But which type is appropriate for a particular organization depends on the nature of the operation, size, and management of the organization. If managed properly, and one structure can give better results.
Related Content of Team Building:
- What is the Meaning of Group?
- Difference between Team and Group
- Importance of Team for an Organization
- What are the Purposes of Effective Team Building for an Organization?
- Conditions for Successful Teams
- Twelve Cs for Team Building
- Life Cycle of a Team
- Potential Team Problems that can Hinder Team Building and Running
- How to Build a Team for an Organization?
- Types of Teams in Organizations
- Self Managed Teams Definition
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Self Managed Teams
- Gestalt Approach to Team Building
- Application of Gestalt Approach