In the organization, both traditional team structure and self managed team structures are prevailing. Between these two structures there are some points of differences. These differences are shown in the following table:
Difference between traditional structure and self managed team structure
|
Dimensions |
Traditional Structure |
Self managed structure |
|
Teams under traditional structure play authoritative roles. |
Teams under self managed structure plays the role of coach and counselor. |
|
Under traditional structure teams become expert in their areas. |
Under this structure teams become champion and cheerleader. |
|
Under traditional team structure members act as teachers. |
While under this structure members act resource allocators |
|
In traditional team structure members act as teachers |
On the other hand, self managed team members become boundary managers. |
|
In this system team member coordinate between the activities. |
Whereas under this system team members facilitate quitting. |
Difference between Traditional Structure and Self managed Team Structure
Both traditional team structure and self-managed team structures are suitable for the organizations. But which type is appropriate for a particular organization that depends on the nature of operation, size and management of the organization. If managed properly, and one structure can give better results.
Related Content of Team Building:
- What is the Meaning of Group?
- Difference between Team and Group
- Importance of Team for an Organization
- What are the Purposes of Effective Team Building for an Organization?
- Conditions for Successful Teams
- Twelve C s for Team Building
- Life Cycle of a Team
- Potential Team Problems that can Hinder Team Building and Running
- How to Build a Team for an Organization?
- Types of Teams in Organizations
- Self Managed Teams Definition
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Self Managed Teams
- Gestalt Approach to Team Building
- Application of Gestalt Approach